Women’s Health Bulletin

Published by: Kowsar

The Relationship Between Socioeconomic Status and the Prevalence of Elective Cesarean Section in Nulliparous Women in Niknafs Teaching Centre in Rafsanjan, Iran

Majid Davari 1 , Mohammadreza Maracy 2 , Zohreh Ghorashi 3 , * and Mitra Mokhtari 4
Authors Information
1 Department of Pharmacoeconomics and Pharmaceutical Administration, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR Iran
2 Department of Epidemiology and Statistics, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, IR Iran
3 Department of Midwifery, Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences, Rafsanjan, IR Iran
4 Teaching and Therapeutics Centre, Niknafs Teaching Center, Rafsanjan, IR Iran
Article information
  • Women's Health Bulletin: June 16, 2014, 1 (2); e20044
  • Published Online: June 11, 2014
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • Received: February 3, 2014
  • Revised: February 25, 2014
  • Accepted: March 14, 2014
  • DOI: 10.17795/whb-20044

To Cite: Davari M, Maracy M, Ghorashi Z, Mokhtari M. The Relationship Between Socioeconomic Status and the Prevalence of Elective Cesarean Section in Nulliparous Women in Niknafs Teaching Centre in Rafsanjan, Iran, Women Health Bull. 2014 ; 1(2):e20044. doi: 10.17795/whb-20044.

Copyright © 2014, Health Policy Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Patients and Methods
4. Results
5. Discussion
  • 1. Kayongo M, Rubardt M, Butera J, Abdullah M, Mboninyibuka D, Madili M. Making EmOC a reality--CARE's experiences in areas of high maternal mortality in Africa. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2006; 92(3): 308-19[DOI][PubMed]
  • 2. Appropriate technology for birth. Lancet. 1985; 2(8452): 436-7[PubMed]
  • 3. Betran AP, Merialdi M, Lauer JA, Bing-Shun W, Thomas J, Van Look P, et al. Rates of caesarean section: analysis of global, regional and national estimates. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2007; 21(2): 98-113[DOI][PubMed]
  • 4. Johnston TC, Coory MD. Increase in caesarean section rates among low-risk women in Queensland, 1990-2004. Med J Aust. 2006; 185(7): 404-5[PubMed]
  • 5. Perinatalcare in the Netherlands. 2007;
  • 6. D'Orsi E, Chor D, Giffin K, Angulo-Tuesta A, Barbosa GP, Gama Ade S, et al. Factors associated with cesarean sections in a public hospital in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Cad Saude Publica. 2006; 22(10): 2067-78[PubMed]
  • 7. Khanal R. Caesarean delivery at Nepal Medical College Teaching Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal. Nepal Med Coll J. 2004; 6(1): 53-5[PubMed]
  • 8. Shariat M, Majlesi F, Azari S, Mahmoudi M. [Cesarean section in maternity hospitals in Tehran, Iran]. Payesh. 2002; 1(3): 10-5
  • 9. Mobaraki A, Zadehbagheri GH, Zandi Ghashghaie KA. [Prevalence of cesarean section and the related causes in Yasuj city in 2003]. Armaghan Danesh. 2005; 10(39): 65-72
  • 10. Mohammad Pour Asl A, Rostami F, Torabi S. [Prevalence of cesarean section and its demographic correlates in Tabriz]. Med J Tabriz University of Med Sci. 2006; 28(3): 101-6
  • 11. Alimohamadian M, Shariat M, Mahmoudi M, Ramezanzadeh F. [The influence of maternal request on the elective cesarean section rate in maternity hospitals in Tehran, Iran]. Payesh. 2003; 2(2): 137-42
  • 12. Vazirian A. [challenge in delivery]. Tabib Mardom. 2004; 5(43): 48-54
  • 13. Azizi F. [Cesarean section: a dramatic elevation]. Res Med. 2007; 31(3): 191-3
  • 14. [Treatment affaires, Maternal health care unit]. 1999;
  • 15. Wilmink FA, Hukkelhoven CW, Lunshof S, Mol BW, van der Post JA, Papatsonis DN. Neonatal outcome following elective cesarean section beyond 37 weeks of gestation: a 7-year retrospective analysis of a national registry. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010; 202(3): 250 e1-8[DOI][PubMed]
  • 16. Quiroz LH, Chang H, Blomquist JL, Okoh YK, Handa VL. Scheduled cesarean delivery: maternal and neonatal risks in primiparous women in a community hospital setting. Am J Perinatol. 2009; 26(4): 271-7[DOI][PubMed]
  • 17. Cox SM, Williams JW. Williams obstetrics. 2005;
  • 18. Pirdehghan A. Evaluation and comparison of normal vaginal delivery and elective cesarean section burden in Isfahan city in 2009. 2010;
  • 19. Chongsuvivatwong V, Bachtiar H, Chowdhury ME, Fernando S, Suwanrath C, Kor-Anantakul O, et al. Maternal and fetal mortality and complications associated with cesarean section deliveries in teaching hospitals in Asia. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2010; 36(1): 45-51[DOI][PubMed]
  • 20. Garmaroudi G, Eftekhar H, Batebi AA. [Cesarean section and related factors in Tehran, Iran]. Payesh. 2002; 1(2): 47-9
  • 21. Catalinotto E. Medically unnecessary Cesarean section. If it's unnecessary, why is it still performed? Am J Nurs. 2007; 107(7): 13[DOI][PubMed]
  • 22. Vahid Dastjerdi M. A Survey of Indications, Outcome and Complications of Cesarean Section. Tehran Univ Med J. 1998; 56(1): 42-5
  • 23. Bodner K, Wierrani F, Grunberger W, Bodner-Adler B. Influence of the mode of delivery on maternal and neonatal outcomes: a comparison between elective cesarean section and planned vaginal delivery in a low-risk obstetric population. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2011; 283(6): 1193-8[DOI][PubMed]
  • 24. Human HA. ConceptionalStatistics in behavioral researches. 1992;
  • 25. Mohammad K, Malekafzali H, Nahapetiyan V. Statistical Methods and Health Indicators. 1998;
  • 26. Heijmans M, de Ridder D. Assessing illness representations of chronic illness: explorations of their disease-specific nature. J Behav Med. 1998; 21(5): 485-503[PubMed]
  • 27. Mayer KB, Buckley WF. Class and society. 1969;
  • 28. Reiss AJ. Occupations and social status. 1961; : 145-72
  • 29. Suchman EA. Social Patterns of Illness and Medical Care. J Health Hum Behav. 1965; 6: 2-16[PubMed]
  • 30. Masoud Nia I. [The effect of social class on the patients' behaviors on Arthritis'patients]. 2003;
  • 31. Davari M, Maraci MR, Bakhshizade Z. [Evaluation of equity in access to pharmaceutical services in selected cities of Isfahan]. 2007;
  • 32. Mohamadbeigi A, Salehi NM. Modeling of associated factors that affect the method of pregnancy termination. Iran J Obstet Gynecol Infertil. 2009; 12(1): 17-24
  • 33. Li J, Wang QH, Wu HM, Wei KL, Yang YJ, Du LZ, et al. [A survey of neonatal births in maternity departments in urban China in 2005]. Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi. 2012; 14(1): 7-10[PubMed]
  • 34. Fairley L, Dundas R, Leyland AH. The influence of both individual and area based socioeconomic status on temporal trends in Caesarean sections in Scotland 1980-2000. BMC Public Health. 2011; 11: 330[DOI][PubMed]
  • 35. Naseriasl M, Pourreza A, Akbari F, Rahimi A. The Effect of Socioeconomic Factors on Cesarean Section Rate in Hospitals of Ardabil Province in 2009. J Health. 2014; 4(4): 349-56
  • 36. Feng XL, Xu L, Guo Y, Ronsmans C. Factors influencing rising caesarean section rates in China between 1988 and 2008. Bull World Health Organ. 2012; 90(1): 30-9[DOI][PubMed]
  • 37. Folland S, Goodman AC, Stano M. The economics of health and health care. 2007;
Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .

Search Relations:



Create Citiation Alert
via Google Reader

Readers' Comments