Women’s Health Bulletin

Published by: Kowsar
Crossmark

A Review of the Impact of Different Social Policy Incentives to Accelerate Population Growth Rate

Samira Behboudi Gandevani 1 , Saideh Ziaee 1 , * and Farideh Khalajabadi Farahani 2
Authors Information
1 Department of Reproductive Health, Faculty of Medical Science, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, IR Iran
2 Department of Population, Health and Family Planning, Population Studies and Research Centre in Asia and The Pacific, Tehran, IR Iran
Article information
  • Women's Health Bulletin: April 1, 1970, 1 (1); e18967
  • Published Online: April 1, 2014
  • Article Type: Review Article
  • Received: January 10, 2014
  • Revised: February 5, 2014
  • Accepted: March 9, 2014
  • DOI: 10.17795/whb-18967

How to Cite: Behboudi Gandevani S, Ziaee S, Khalajabadi Farahani F. A Review of the Impact of Different Social Policy Incentives to Accelerate Population Growth Rate, Women Health Bull. 1970 ; 1(1):e18967. doi: 10.17795/whb-18967.

Abstract
Copyright © 2014, Health Policy Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Context
2. Evidence Acquisition
3. Result
4. Conclusions
Acknowledgements
Footnotes
References
  • 1. Abbasi-Shavazi MJ, McDonald P, Hosseini-Chavoshi M. The fertility transition in Iran: Revolution and reproduction. 2009;
  • 2. National census, Iranian National census 2011
  • 3. Rindfuss RR, Brauner-Otto SR. Institutions and the transition to adulthood: Implications for fertility tempo in low-fertility settings. Vienna Yearb Popul Res. 2008; 2008 : 57 -87 [DOI][PubMed]
  • 4. Cooke A, Mills TA, Lavender T. 'Informed and uninformed decision making'--women's reasoning, experiences and perceptions with regard to advanced maternal age and delayed childbearing: a meta-synthesis. Int J Nurs Stud. 2010; 47(10) : 1317 -29 [DOI][PubMed]
  • 5. Skouby SO. Contraceptive use and behavior in the 21st century: a comprehensive study across five European countries. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2004; 9(2) : 57 -68 [PubMed]
  • 6. Brewster KL, Rindfuss RR. Fertility and women's employment in industrialized nations. Annual review of sociology. 2000; 26(1) : 271 -96
  • 7. Budig MJ. Are women’s employment and fertility histories interdependent? An examination of causal order using event history analysis. Soc Sci Res. 2003; (32) : 376–401
  • 8. McDonald P. Very Low Fertility Consequences, Causes and Policy Approaches. Japan J Populat. 2008; 6(1) : 205 -13
  • 9. te Velde E, Habbema D, Leridon H, Eijkemans M. The effect of postponement of first motherhood on permanent involuntary childlessness and total fertility rate in six European countries since the 1970s. 2012; 27(4) : 1179 -83 [DOI][PubMed]
  • 10. Delbaere I, Verstraelen H, Goetgeluk S, Martens G, De Backer G, Temmerman M. Pregnancy outcome in primiparae of advanced maternal age. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2007; 135(1) : 41 -6 [DOI][PubMed]
  • 11. Ferraretti AP, Goossens V, de Mouzon J, Bhattacharya S, Castilla JA, Korsak V, et al. Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2008: results generated from European registers by ESHRE. Hum Reprod. 2012; 27(9) : 2571 -84 [DOI][PubMed]
  • 12. Watt AM, Elshaug AG, Willis CD, Hiller JE, Astute Health study group . Assisted reproductive technologies: a systematic review of safety and effectiveness to inform disinvestment policy. Health Policy. 2011; 102(2-3) : 200 -13 [DOI][PubMed]
  • 13. Holland JA, Thomson E. Stepfamily childbearing in Sweden: quantum and tempo effects, 1950-99. Popul Stud (Camb). 2011; 65(1) : 115 -28 [DOI][PubMed]
  • 14. Aassve A, Billari F, Spe´der Z. Societal transition, policy changes and family formation: evidence from Hungary. 2006; (22) : 127–152
  • 15. Laroque G, Salanié B. Does fertility respond to financial incentives? 2008;
  • 16. Yap MT. Fertility and Population Policy: the Singapore Experience. J Popu Soci Secur. 2011; (1) : 119 -207
  • 17. Milligan K. Subsidizing the stork: new evidence on tax incentives and fertility. Rev Econ Stat. 2005; (87) : 539–555
  • 18. World Health Organization W. Women and Health: Today’s Evidence Tomorrow’s Agenda. Geneva: World Health Organization. 2009
  • 19. Gupta ND, Smith N, Verner M. The impact of Nordic countries’ family friendly policies on employment, wages, and children. Review of Economics of the Household. 2008; 6(1) : 65 -89
  • 20. Letablier MT, Luci A, Math A, Thevenon O. The Cost of Raising Children and the Effectiveness of Policies to Support Parenthood in European Countries: A Literature Review. Directorate-General Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities. Euro Commission. 2009;
  • 21. Rindfuss RR, Guilkey D, Morgan SP, Kravdal O, Guzzo KB. Child care availability and first-birth timing in Norway. Demography. 2007; 44(2) : 345 -72 [PubMed]
  • 22. Rønsen M. Fertility and public policies—evidence from Norway and Finland. Demo Res. 2004; (10)
  • 23. Inui A. Restructuring youth: recent studies of Japanese youth and its contextual origin. J Youth Stud. 2003; (6) : 219–233
  • 24. Del Boca D. The effect of child care and part-time opportunities on participation and fertility decisions in Italy. J Pop Econ. 2002; (15) : 549–573
  • 25. Mills M, Rindfuss RR, McDonald P, te Velde E, Eshre Reproduction , Society Task F. Why do people postpone parenthood? Reasons and social policy incentives. Hum Reprod Update. 2011; 17(6) : 848 -60 [DOI][PubMed]
  • 26. Gauthier A. The impact of family policies on fertility in industrialized countries: a review of the literature. Popul Res Policy Rev. 2007; (26) : 323–46
  • 27. Kearny M. Is there an effect of incremental welfare benefits on fertility behavior? A look at the family cap. J Hum Res. 2004; (39) : 295–325
  • 28. Castles F. The world turned upside down: below replacement fertility, changing preferences and family-friendly public policy in 21 OECD countries. J Euro Soc Pol. 2003; (13) : 209–227
  • 29. Di Prete TA, Philip MS, Engelhardt H, Pacalova H. Do cross-national differences in the costs of children generate cross-national differences in fertility rates? J Popul Res Policy Rev. 2003; (22) : 439–477
  • 30. Hank K, Kreyenfeld M. A multilevel analysis of child care and women’s fertility decisions in Western Germany. J Mar Fam. 2003; (65) : 584–596
  • 31. Zabel C. Eligibility for maternity leave and first birth timing in Great Britain. J Popul Res Policy Rev. 2009; (28) : 251–270
Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .

Search Relations:

Author(s):

Article(s):

Create Citiation Alert
via Google Reader

Readers' Comments